Most of us argue as if we are defending objective truths. Yet our views today are shaped by:
social media feeds,
echo chambers, and
communities that reward alignment rather than reflection.
What feels “obvious” to one person may feel completely alien to another, simply because their experience is structured by different influences.
Phenomenology reminds us that every person sees the world through their own lens. When we recognize this, our conversations change. Instead of reacting defensively, we begin to ask:
How did this person come to see things this way?
What experiences shape their perception?
This shift doesn’t mean abandoning truth. It simply means acknowledging that perception is formed through many forces—personal history, culture, and now, digital environments.
Bringing this insight into everyday life can transform discussions in homes, community gatherings, and public forums. When we make room for subjective experience, we create:
less defensiveness,
more curiosity,
and a deeper sense of connection.
In this way, a seemingly abstract philosophical method becomes a practical tool for a more compassionate and constructive public sphere.
ADHD-affected individuals often have trouble reading for long periods. Many report trouble concentrating, experience headaches, sleepiness, and restlessness while attempting to read. The problem is...
Over the years I have found it more useful to limit the term mental illness to severe psychiatric...
One of the defining marks of a good physician is the capacity to approach illness with both objectivity...